Common App essay reviewer
A read of your college essay against what US admissions officers weigh — story, reflection, and whether the person on the page sounds like anyone in particular.
Check my personal statement →Free review, no card needed. Results in about three minutes.
- -Judged as a narrative, not a CV
- -Common App and supplements
- -Free review, no card needed
A Common App essay is not a personal statement
Applicants who have looked at UK advice often arrive with a statement of academic credentials, and it reads badly to a US reader. A UCAS statement argues that you are prepared for a subject. A Common App essay does something else entirely: it shows an admissions officer who you are when you are not performing.
So the criteria here are different. Your grades, scores and activities are already elsewhere in the application. Repeating them in the essay wastes the one place in the file where you get to sound like a person. The essay is judged on whether it tells a real story, whether you reflect on it in a way that shows self-awareness, and whether the voice belongs to you rather than to an idea of what a college essay should sound like.
The specific failure modes it looks for
The trophy essay. Something impressive happened and you describe it. Impressive events do not carry an essay — the reader wants what it cost you and what you understood afterwards, and a résumé in prose gives them neither.
The unearned epiphany. A tidy realization arrives in the last paragraph, and it is not visible anywhere earlier in the piece. Readers see hundreds of these a season and stop believing them.
The borrowed voice. Vocabulary that is a register above how you actually speak, usually because a draft went through a thesaurus or a chatbot. It reads as distance, and distance is the opposite of the point.
The invisible narrator. Three hundred words describing a grandparent, a coach, a country. All lovely, none of it about you. If the essay would survive with your name removed, it is not doing its job.
Supplements too
The why-this-college supplement is where most applications quietly lose ground. Almost every answer is interchangeable: a strong program, distinguished faculty, a vibrant community. Swap the college name and the paragraph still works, which is precisely the problem, and admissions readers spot it instantly.
Supplements are reviewed against that test. If a sentence would be true of forty other schools, it gets flagged, along with what specific thing would have to go in its place — a named course, a particular lab, a professor whose actual work connects to something you have already done.
Common questions
Does it review the Common App personal essay and supplements?
Both. Pick the essay type before submitting; the criteria differ, because a 650-word personal essay and a 150-word why-us supplement are judged on genuinely different things.
Will it rewrite my essay?
No. It reviews and tells you what to change. US colleges treat AI-written essays as a serious integrity problem, and admissions readers have become good at recognising them. Feedback keeps the essay yours.
Does it check for AI-sounding writing?
Yes, on every review. The report flags sentences with the patterns readers have learned to associate with generated text, which matters even when you wrote every word yourself — the patterns are contagious once you have read enough of them.
Is the review free?
Yes, all of it. The full report — section-by-section feedback, an overall band and the line-by-line notes on individual sentences — with no card. You need a free account, and you get one review every 48 hours.
Free review
See what an admissions reader would flag
Paste your draft and get a structured read in minutes, benchmarked against thousands of real statements and the judgement of five admissions counsellors.
Start free →